The Little Town, anywhere, Canada
and the affiliated Regional Districts
Are NGO’s taking over our local governments in order to push the climate narrative?
Like any small town and regional district through out Canada (since the majority of Canada is actually quite rural), it appears that the attraction for going after grants and feeling good about projects is pretty high on these civil servants list of ‘do right by me and advance my career.’ I say this, because, when I’ve tried to message some of our local area people about ulterior motives that come with these great carrots, they just turn off their ears.
Honorable Mayor and Counsel, Regional Directors, do you really have the authority to subscribe your entire constituency to a narrative that supports a “Climate Emergency?"
Do you feel you have as much knowledge to represent this argument that you could stand up to these almost 2000 signatories on the CLINTEL WORLD CLIMATE DECLARATION - THERE IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY?
It’s not often we get to hear or see some of these terms hitting our local council. We can’t wait to see how the comments are spun online.
In the meantime take a listen for yourself as Adrienne speaks on behalf of our concerned community, as top-down and global directives sneak their way into the local voting booths.1
You know I’ve sent CO2coalition.org Climate Quiz truly hoping that our counsel and mayor would take a look at how this climate AGENDA may impact not only the people of their small towns, but also most likely will impact their very own family members too!
In the region of North Cowichan Valley, Vancouver Island residence have… “written North Cowichan a few times to better understand the ‘Climate Lens’ all policy and decisions filter through.
The staff has confirmed the council did not provide a definition for any of these things, nor do they explain what it means.
Now we wait for a response from the Environmental team, specifically Jennifer Aldcroft, North Cowichan’s Climate Change Specialist.”2
Climate Change Policies and Their Local Impact - another COAP initiative:
Explore the unintended consequences of climate change policies on local communities. Discover how well-intentioned global efforts can sometimes leave neighbourhoods grappling with higher costs of living, unaffordable homes, and economic challenges. This section delves into the need for a balanced approach that considers both environmental sustainability and the well-being of local residents.
What is becoming apparent is that our civil servants who are working for the people, have stopped listening to the questioning and the narrative is now coming from these NGO programs. (May I reframe this once again to de facto arrangements). It’s becoming a new policy change in each community OCP so we are slowly and eventually losing our voices completely.
But don’t you as the politician consider your fate once the UN Agenda is in full force?
Reviewing the latest IPCC Report, one is struck by how far-ranging this global Panel now ventures—into “social sciences,” economics, politics, and (of course) social justice. Notable is the wide range of supposed disciplines brought to bear on the single issue of greenhouse gasses, while other contributing causes of environmental harm—especially chemical pollution—are comprehensively sidestepped.3
Out there in the global perspective on climate crisis, the scientists are pushing back on this narrative:
Scientists Expose Major Problems With Climate Change Data
Temperature records used by climate scientists and governments to build models that then forecast dangerous manmade global warming repercussions have serious problems and even corruption in the data, multiple scientists who have published recent studies on the issue told The Epoch Times.4
Exposing the Climate Racket: The Latest IPCC Report
The entire world appears enthralled with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and its periodic edicts. The pretension is that this is a “scientific” organization employing scientific methodology to forecast risks of global warming. It isn’t.5
Green Climate Emergency = Economic Plight
It is reckless to base large political and energy policy on something that has a track record of being 100 percent wrong thus what is the evidence today that is being presented to justify such.6
Fundamentally production of green energies costs more in resources and consumes more land mass and also has proven to not be as sustainable or productive due to basis of data founded in unrealistic collection formats.
Why Zero Carbon Green Agenda is Impossible
Ground Up Total Cost
Almost no studies by the Green Lobby look at the total production chain from mining to smelting to production for solar panels and wind assemblies. Instead they make fraudulent assertions of the alleged lower cost per KWh of produced solar or wind at the highly subsidized costs. In 2021 Professor Simon P. Michaux of the Geological Survey of Finland (GTK) published an unusual study of the materials costs in terms of raw materials to produce a global Zero Carbon economy. The costs are staggering.7
We are just entering into a platform of implementation that our mayors and counsel and area directors have still the choice to proceed or not. We have to realize, this climate narrative has many well written documents that seduce our hard working civil servants into believing they are doing something good and ‘they’ provide all the research and data to prove so.
‘they’ as in:
As history reveals our Monarchy set up the Green New Deal… 8
UN Sustainable Development and Climate Action
Mark Carney and Canada 2020 - catch phrase of Sustainable Development Goals ties integrity for carbon credit with economics of our future
ICLEI and their promised carrots on a stick grants (prime example of a private corporation joining our government public service = definition of a de facto government here).
Same goes for UBCM - I’m sure there are similar programs in other provinces doing the de facto dance.
I could dig into this more, I’m sure you are getting the drift here?
Because something we haven’t even touched yet is a much much bigger concern that hardly ANYONE is talking about ~ Intentional Weather Modification.
The question becomes downright eerie when the IPCC instead advocates for more chemical applications to the ecosystem as a solution to greenhouse gas warming: a climate-sensitive diet is now to be “balanced” by plants, to save the world from cows.
Curious, mayor’s, counsellors, directors, do you have any idea of how many planes are in our skies at this very moment?
https://www.flightradar24.com/4.57,59.49/2
How about how many ships are navigating the waterways of our planet?
https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:81.9/centery:52.5/zoom:2
Do you really feel that it makes sense to remove our regenerative farming practices and replace these farmlands with solar farms, because cow’s fart? (Ok this is not a scientific question here, I’m attempting to approach our morality on this climate subject!)
https://coap.ca/north-cowichan-ngos-wef-un/
https://coap.ca/explain-climate-emergency-north-cowichan/
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/04/no_author/exposing-the-climate-racket-the-latest-ipcc-report/
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/03/no_author/scientists-expose-major-problems-with-climate-change-data/
https://substack.com/@cynthiachung/p-137529172
https://larouchepub.com/other/2021/4807-prince_charles_invented_green_nd.html
https://canadianpatriot.org/2023/05/01/why-zero-carbon-green-agenda-is-impossible/
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/04/no_author/exposing-the-climate-racket-the-latest-ipcc-report/
I've looked at the climate issue myself, and what I've found is that the Earth's climate is in constant flux, mostly owing to cyclical changes in solar output - nothing to do with us. Where you and I live was under a km of ice 10K years ago. That's what carved out the Fraser Valley. Alberta and Sask. were once a shallow sea with a tropical climate. It's utter nonsense to think we can control any of that, but worse, by imagining that we can, we detract from the urgent measures needed to control pollution and the degradation of our natural environment. Those are the things we can do, but get pushed aside by this absurd carbon agenda, which is nothing more that a scam to enrich a handful of corporations and wealthy aristocrats.
Even if it were true, and carbon is a real problem, how are you going to stop China, India and other nations from pursuing industrialization? China and India burn a lot of coal. They will eventually replace that with nuclear energy. Are we against nuclear energy as well? Seems like it, and yet that's actually a practical way to reduce air pollution, which is a major threat to health in much of the world.
Today's reactors are not like the ancient power plants that caused the problems being hoicked up as a reason to abandon that approach. That's like claiming automobiles are unsafe because a few old cars from the 60's are still on the road. New technologies always have startup issues, but it doesn't mean we abandon them. Look how far we've come in aviation since the Wright Bros. This is one area where people need to be educated so they understand that there are alternatives to the Green Agenda of wind and solar power, both of which are colossal failures and can never fully replace the use of petroleum or nuclear power in modern society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_IV_reactor
Good work, please keep it up!